Arm Mali Cameras or Image Signal Processors (ISPs) deliver the highest image quality for embedded and automotive applications.
The Mali-C32 and Mali-C52 are designed for a wide variety of applications, such as security and smart cameras. They process each pixel in real time and deliver the best high dynamic image as well as great low-light performance.
The Mali-C71 is designed for the emerging smart automotive market, capturing twice the dynamic range of a standard single exposure sensor, and in some cases even outperforming the human eye. The Mali-C71 supports the requirements of SIL3 and ASIL-D functional safety for a variety of automotive applications from all-round vehicle awareness, mirror replacement, through to night vision improvement.
The Arm Mali-C71 delivers key visual information for the smart automotive market, creating clear and convenient viewing for the driver.
The Arm Mali-C52 delivers unparalleled image quality that is available in two configurations – it can be optimized for image quality or optimized for area.
The Arm Mali-C32 delivers outstanding image quality and state-of-the-art image signal processing in real-time. This ISP is optimized for area.
The Arm Mali Cameras have been specifically designed for the automotive and embedded market segments:
Security and internet protocol (IP) cameras
Drones and personal robots
Get support with Arm Training courses and design reviews. You can also open a support case or manage existing cases.
|Not answered||Porting a mali_egl_image* Utgard application to Midgard||0 votes||93 views||0 replies||Started yesterday by Chris S||Answer this|
|Answered||How to access(zero copy) AHardWareBuffer and ANativeWindow_Buffer, with Mali OpenCL?||0 votes||29407 views||15 replies||Latest yesterday by Kévin Petit||Answer this|
|Answered||MSAA 2x on Mali - GLES||0 votes||699 views||1 replies||Latest 6 days ago by Peter Harris||Answer this|
|Answered||Cache data invalidation between kernel calls in OpenCL||0 votes||847 views||1 replies||Latest 10 days ago by Kévin Petit||Answer this|
|Suggested answer||The difference between clEnqueueSVMMap and clEnqueueMapBuffer||0 votes||7450 views||1 replies||Latest 13 days ago by Kévin Petit||Answer this|
|Suggested answer||OpenCL: why there is so big difference between the time counter of cl_profiling_info ?||0 votes||6250 views||1 replies||Latest 13 days ago by Kévin Petit||Answer this|
|Not answered||Porting a mali_egl_image* Utgard application to Midgard Started yesterday by Chris S||0 replies 93 views|
|Answered||How to access(zero copy) AHardWareBuffer and ANativeWindow_Buffer, with Mali OpenCL? Latest yesterday by Kévin Petit||15 replies 29407 views|
|Answered||MSAA 2x on Mali - GLES Latest 6 days ago by Peter Harris||1 replies 699 views|
|Answered||Cache data invalidation between kernel calls in OpenCL Latest 10 days ago by Kévin Petit||1 replies 847 views|
|Suggested answer||The difference between clEnqueueSVMMap and clEnqueueMapBuffer Latest 13 days ago by Kévin Petit||1 replies 7450 views|
|Suggested answer||OpenCL: why there is so big difference between the time counter of cl_profiling_info ? Latest 13 days ago by Kévin Petit||1 replies 6250 views|